Presentation Storytelling
Project workbook ยท Path 96

Create a six-frame presentation storyboard with a clear decision, evidence sequence and rehearsal plan.

The case

A fictional library team asks for a two-week pilot of a simpler booking form. In the synthetic case, 40 of 100 attempts fail and a proposed pilot requires 12 staff-hours. No pilot has occurred. The audience must decide whether to authorize the test, not whether the idea has already succeeded.

Case factValue
Observed attempts in synthetic sample100
Failed attempts40
Proposed pilot duration2 weeks
Estimated staff effort12 hours
STAGE 1

Define the audience and decision

Name what the audience should understand and decide at the end. A presentation can be informative without demanding action, but this case asks for a bounded pilot. State the request early and identify concerns the audience is likely to have. Avoid filling slides before the purpose is clear.

Your task

Write a one-sentence decision request and audience brief.

Required output

Presentation brief

Record your result and evidence here or in a separate file.

Review gate

The requested decision is authorize a two-week test, not approve a proven solution.

If the gate is not met

Replace a broad topic with a specific decision.

STAGE 2

Build the argument sequence

Arrange the story so each frame earns the next. For this case use decision, problem evidence, proposed change, pilot method, resource request and success/stop rules. Keep assumptions visible and do not make the audience infer the connection between a chart and the recommendation.

Your task

Draft six frame headlines and one supporting point each.

Required output

Six-frame storyboard

Record your result and evidence here or in a separate file.

Review gate

Every frame contributes to the final decision.

If the gate is not met

Remove a frame that has no role in the argument.

STAGE 3

Make evidence visual and honest

A visual should clarify one comparison or relationship. Show 40 failed attempts out of 100 with the denominator visible. Do not present a future improvement bar without evidence. Use a pilot-plan diagram to communicate the proposed sequence instead of fabricating an after-result.

Your task

Create the problem chart and pilot sequence.

Required output

Two evidence visuals

Record your result and evidence here or in a separate file.

Review gate

Only the baseline has a result; the pilot outcome is marked to be measured.

If the gate is not met

Replace predicted results with a measurement plan.

STAGE 4

Write the opening and close

The opening should orient the audience to the problem and decision. The close should repeat the bounded request and the next step, not introduce new evidence. Use plain language and distinguish estimates from commitments. A spoken script should support the visual rather than force the audience to read paragraphs.

Your task

Write a 45-second opening and 30-second close.

Required output

Speaker notes

Record your result and evidence here or in a separate file.

Review gate

The close names the 12-hour estimate and the approval needed.

If the gate is not met

Move detailed caveats into concise spoken context or supporting notes.

STAGE 5

Rehearse and handle questions

Rehearsal can reveal missing transitions and unsupported claims. Time an actual run if possible and record what changed. Prepare honest responses to cost, evidence and failure questions. If the case cannot answer a question, state the evidence the pilot will collect rather than inventing it.

Your task

Run or plan a five-minute rehearsal and answer five likely questions.

Required output

Rehearsal and Q&A log

Record your result and evidence here or in a separate file.

Review gate

Actual rehearsal observations are distinct from planned checks.

If the gate is not met

Do not fabricate audience feedback or timing.

Final project

Deliver the six-frame HTML storyboard, two visuals, opening, close, Q&A and actual rehearsal notes when performed. Ask a reviewer to state the requested decision after seeing the first and last frames.

Critical condition

The presentation never turns a proposed pilot into a completed success story.

CriterionPointsEvidence
Evidence and correctness30Calculations, source use and results match the supplied case; limitations are honest.
Required artifacts30All five stage outputs and the capstone handoff are present and inspectable.
Reasoning and decisions20Choices, assumptions, alternatives and the case-specific critical condition are explained.
Reproducibility10A reviewer can follow the stated steps and distinguish expected from observed results.
Clear communication10Labels, units, structure and evidence references make the work easy to review.

Score at least 80/100, supply every required artifact, and satisfy the path-specific critical condition. Rework missing evidence before marking complete.

Worked reference

The synthetic baseline failure rate is 40/100 = 40%. The proposal is a two-week, 12-hour pilot with success and stop rules to be defined. There is no after-pilot result. The storyboard makes that distinction visible.

Boundaries

This is a storyboard and rehearsal package, not a delivered talk, tested intervention or PowerPoint file.