ORIGINAL WORKED REFERENCE

40/200=20% and 36/240=15%. The rate fell 5 percentage points, or 25% relative to 20%. A defensible statement is that the later sample has a lower no-show rate; it is not that the program has proven a 25% causal improvement.

CRITICAL CONDITION
Outputs are not reported as realized benefits, and before-and-after comparisons are not presented as causal proof.

LIMITS
This is benefits planning and interpretation, not a complete program-management certification or an impact evaluation.

This reference is not a learner submission or proof of provider-course completion. See material-verification.json in the production package for actual preparation checks.
